From the beginning of recorded history, we’ve pondered big questions: How did we get here? What came before us? What comes after?

Without answers, the best way to solve these question was deductive reasoning. Observing the world around us, and creating predictions that could be tested to fill in the gaps. In this pursuit, however, something unexpected happened.

Across the world, observations did not match a reality that could be tracked with

, divided by time and space, people observed anomalies that could not be solved by pragmatism. everything that was observed could be accounted for.

Anomalies existed.

Some embraced the anomalies. Others decided to proceed without addressing them.

This divided us into two camps. A logic based camp which focused purely on the measurable and testable, while ignoring the anomalies.

A reason based camp that acknowledged the unknown and wrote it into dogma.

Without answers, the best way to solve these question was deductive reasoning: observing the state of nature around us, and creating testable predictions that could determine if . In this pursuit, however, something unexpected happened.

In some cases, the answers became clearer. Outcomes aligned with predictions,

we divided us into two camps.

By the Aristotelian definition, one appealed to reason. This camp acknowledged

In the shadows of these grander questions of existence, sits an equally significant question that often goes unnoticed. these questions sits a deeper, more personal story we’ve yet to solve: what makes you, YOU. What allows you to see and experience the world different from an inanimate object? And why is your identity assigned to you, and not someone else?

unexplainable and built it into a theological belief system fearing the unknown. The other, a logic based camp that attempted to eliminate uncertainty in favor of only what could be physically observed, tested, and replicated. In this pursuit, the logic abandoned acknowledgement of unexplained phenomenon that has been consistently reported by large populations across the globe - often in isolation where the simple invariance of reports begs the issues to be treated with more scrutiny.

​

And in the mid twentieth century, that gap got much wider with the observation of particles smaller than the atom, black holes, and dark matter.

Over the past year, the UAP Intelligence Committee have more than shaken things up on the topic of UAP disclosure. Not because contact has been made (Tim Burchett), or a diagram of quantum effects has been shared on social media (Rep. Anna Paulina Luna), or because of a collective suggestion that there's something more to the story of the ~11 scientists in advanced technology fields who've gone missing — but because together, all of these mysterious threads point to something far different, far stranger, and possibly far bigger than anything we've imagined.